Solve 7-2*(3x)= | Microsoft Math Solver

Type a math problem

keyboard

Submit

Evaluate

7 - 6 x

Solution Steps

7 - 2 \times (3 x) =

Multiply

2

and

3

to get

6

.

7 - 6 x

Graph

Quiz

10 problems similar to:

7 - 2 \times (3 x) =

Giving is as easy as 1, 2, 3

Get 1,000 points to donate to a school of your choice when you join Give With Bing

Similar Problems from Web Search

Homology of closed, oriented surfaces of genus

2

3

https://math.stackexchange.com/q/1969738

X_{i}

i (= 2, 3)

-genus closed orientable surface. So to compute

H_{1}

we need to see the structure of fundamental group. As we know that a

g -

genus orieted surface has the cell structure with ...

Variance of a random variable representing the sum of two dice

https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/237285/variance-of-a-random-variable-representing-the-sum-of-two-dice

The formula you give is not for two independent random variables. It's for random variables that are as far from independent as you can get. If

X, Y

Right adjoint to the product in an over category

https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/189450/right-adjoint-to-the-product-in-an-over-category

I don't understand the point of your question. If it is easier to describe the construction in

C ↓ X

\hat{C} ↓ Y (X)

, then why not use the ...

How can we understand a group-scheme action as a natural transformation

https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2903614/how-can-we-understand-a-group-scheme-action-as-a-natural-transformation

The Yoneda lemma, when applied to the case where

F

is itself a representable functor

h_{B}

, gives you an isomorphism

H o m (A, B) = h_{B} (A) ≅ H o m (h_{A}, h_{B})

(note that the two

H o m

If two infinite sets have the finite closed topology, then their product does not have the finite closed topology.

https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1820894/if-two-infinite-sets-have-the-finite-closed-topology-then-their-product-does-no

X

has the "finite-closed" topology, if the only closed sets are

X

and the finite subsets of

X

X_{1}, X_{2}

are two infinite spaces, then

X_{1} ∖ {x_{1}}

X_{1}

X_{1}

A question from Algebraic Geometry: scheme over the spectrum of a DVR

https://math.stackexchange.com/q/993049

This is just a very rough sketch of a proof -- you'll need to fill in some of the relevant hypotheses and do some commutative algebra to make it rigorous -- but it's possible to give a rigorous proof ...

Share

reddit

Copy

Copied to clipboard

7-6x

Multiply 2 and 3 to get 6.

Examples

Quadratic equation

x^{2} - 4 x - 5 = 0

4 sin θ cos θ = 2 sin θ

Linear equation

y = 3 x + 4

699 * 533

[2534] [2 - 1 0135]

Simultaneous equation

{8 x + 2 y = 46 7 x + 3 y = 47

Differentiation

\frac{d}{d x} \frac{( 3 x ^{2} - 2 )}{( x - 5 )}

\int_{0}^{1} x e^{- x^{2}} d x

x \to - 3 lim \frac{x ^{2} - 9}{x ^{2} + 2 x - 3}

Back to top

Back to top

Back to top