Overslaan en naar de inhoud gaan
Microsoft
|
Math Solver
Oplossen
Spelen
Oefenen
Download
Oplossen
Oefenen
Spelen
Spel Centraal
Plezier + Vaardigheden verbeteren = winnen!
Onderwerpen
Pre-Algebra
Gemiddelde
Modus
Grootste Gemene Deler
Kleinste Gemene Veelvoud
Bewerkingsvolgorde
Breuken
Gemengde Breuken
Ontbinding in priemfactoren
Exponenten
Wortels
Algebra
Combineer Soortgelijke Termen
Een variabele oplossen
Factor
Uitbreiden
Breuken evalueren
Lineaire Vergelijkingen
Vierkantsvergelijkingen
Ongelijkheden
Stelsels van vergelijking
Matrices
Trigonometrie
Vereenvoudigen
Evalueren
Grafieken
Vergelijkingen oplossen
Analyse
Afgeleiden
Integralen
Limieten
Algebracalculator
Trigonometrische calculator
Calculuscalculator
Grafische Rekenmachine
Download
Spel Centraal
Plezier + Vaardigheden verbeteren = winnen!
Onderwerpen
Pre-Algebra
Gemiddelde
Modus
Grootste Gemene Deler
Kleinste Gemene Veelvoud
Bewerkingsvolgorde
Breuken
Gemengde Breuken
Ontbinding in priemfactoren
Exponenten
Wortels
Algebra
Combineer Soortgelijke Termen
Een variabele oplossen
Factor
Uitbreiden
Breuken evalueren
Lineaire Vergelijkingen
Vierkantsvergelijkingen
Ongelijkheden
Stelsels van vergelijking
Matrices
Trigonometrie
Vereenvoudigen
Evalueren
Grafieken
Vergelijkingen oplossen
Analyse
Afgeleiden
Integralen
Limieten
Algebracalculator
Trigonometrische calculator
Calculuscalculator
Grafische Rekenmachine
Oplossen
algebra
Trigonometrie
statistieken
analyse
matrices
variabelen
lijst
mode(1%2C1%2C2%2C2%2C3%2C3)
Evalueren
1
Quiz
5 opgaven vergelijkbaar met:
mode(1%2C1%2C2%2C2%2C3%2C3)
Vergelijkbare problemen van Web Search
Show that “\Gamma \models S \Rightarrow \Gamma \vdash S” entails “if \Gamma \nvdash P \And \sim P then \Gamma is satisfiable”
https://math.stackexchange.com/q/691980
So I think this is what we may want to do. Suppose for contradiction that \Gamma is not satisfiable. This means that \Gamma has no models. Now, fix some sentence P and let S \equiv P \wedge \neg P ...
Elimination of quantifiers for the theory of equivalence relations with two infinite classes by back-and-forth
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1795992/elimination-of-quantifiers-for-the-theory-of-equivalence-relations-with-two-infi
There are a few problems with what your definition of E_0. You haven't defined E_0 on the class of all tuples, just on the pairs (the 2-tuples). When should singletons be E_0-related? What ...
Logic: Maximally consistent and validity
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/353030/logic-maximally-consistent-and-validity
Assuming that all the results you're invoking (for example that a maximal consistent set must contain either \phi or \neg\phi) are available, your argument looks correct but unnecessarily ...
A truth definition, wrong, but where
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/661222/a-truth-definition-wrong-but-where
It seems that you are trying to inductively defined a class of the form S = \{(\phi, \vec{x}) : \phi \in \text{Form} \wedge \vec{x} \in V^{\omega} \wedge V \vDash \phi(\vec{x})\}. The trouble in ...
Comparing models through partial isomorphisms
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/568236/comparing-models-through-partial-isomorphisms
As you have noticed, the condition implies that \mathfrak{A} and \mathfrak{B} satisfy the same existential sentences. It follows that they also satisfy the same universal sentences. And, of ...
A sentence that has infinite models, finite model, but no finite model above certain cardinality
https://math.stackexchange.com/q/442888
Certainly. Consider \cal L to be the language containing one binary relation symbol <. T is the theory stating that < is a linear order (irreflexive, transitive and total). \sigma is the ...
Meer Items
Delen
Kopiëren
Gekopieerd naar klembord
Soortgelijke problemen
mode(1,2,3,2,1,2,3)
mode(1,2,3)
mode(20,34,32,35,45,32,45,32,32)
mode(2,4,5,3,2,4,5,6,4,3,2)
mode(10,11,10,12)
mode(1,1,2,2,3,3)
Terug naar boven