Langkau ke kandungan utama
Microsoft
|
Math Solver
Selesaikan
Bermain
Latihan
Muat turun
Selesaikan
Latihan
Bermain
Pusat Permainan
Menyeronokkan + meningkatkan kemahiran = Menang!
Topik
Pra-algebra
Min
Mod
Faktor Sepunya Terbesar
Gandaan Sepunya Terkecil
Aturan Operasi
Pecahan
Pecahan Campuran
Pemfaktoran Perdana
Eksponen
Radikal
Algebra
Gabungkan Istilah Serupa
Selesaikan untuk mendapat pemboleh ubah
Faktor
Kembangkan
Menilai Pecahan
Persamaan Linear
Persamaan Kuadratik
Ketaksamaan
Sistem Persamaan
Matriks
Trigonometri
Permudahkan
Menilai
Graf
Selesaikan Persamaan
Kalkulus
Derivatif
Kamiran
Had
Kalkulator Algebra
Kalkulator Trigonometri
Kalkulator Kalkulus
Kalkulator Matriks
Muat turun
Pusat Permainan
Menyeronokkan + meningkatkan kemahiran = Menang!
Topik
Pra-algebra
Min
Mod
Faktor Sepunya Terbesar
Gandaan Sepunya Terkecil
Aturan Operasi
Pecahan
Pecahan Campuran
Pemfaktoran Perdana
Eksponen
Radikal
Algebra
Gabungkan Istilah Serupa
Selesaikan untuk mendapat pemboleh ubah
Faktor
Kembangkan
Menilai Pecahan
Persamaan Linear
Persamaan Kuadratik
Ketaksamaan
Sistem Persamaan
Matriks
Trigonometri
Permudahkan
Menilai
Graf
Selesaikan Persamaan
Kalkulus
Derivatif
Kamiran
Had
Kalkulator Algebra
Kalkulator Trigonometri
Kalkulator Kalkulus
Kalkulator Matriks
Selesaikan
algebra
trigonometri
statistik
kalkulus
matriks
pemboleh ubah
senarai
mode(1%2C1%2C2%2C2%2C3%2C3)
Nilaikan
1
Kuiz
5 masalah yang serupa dengan:
mode(1%2C1%2C2%2C2%2C3%2C3)
Masalah Sama dari Carian Web
Show that “\Gamma \models S \Rightarrow \Gamma \vdash S” entails “if \Gamma \nvdash P \And \sim P then \Gamma is satisfiable”
https://math.stackexchange.com/q/691980
So I think this is what we may want to do. Suppose for contradiction that \Gamma is not satisfiable. This means that \Gamma has no models. Now, fix some sentence P and let S \equiv P \wedge \neg P ...
Elimination of quantifiers for the theory of equivalence relations with two infinite classes by back-and-forth
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1795992/elimination-of-quantifiers-for-the-theory-of-equivalence-relations-with-two-infi
There are a few problems with what your definition of E_0. You haven't defined E_0 on the class of all tuples, just on the pairs (the 2-tuples). When should singletons be E_0-related? What ...
Logic: Maximally consistent and validity
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/353030/logic-maximally-consistent-and-validity
Assuming that all the results you're invoking (for example that a maximal consistent set must contain either \phi or \neg\phi) are available, your argument looks correct but unnecessarily ...
A truth definition, wrong, but where
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/661222/a-truth-definition-wrong-but-where
It seems that you are trying to inductively defined a class of the form S = \{(\phi, \vec{x}) : \phi \in \text{Form} \wedge \vec{x} \in V^{\omega} \wedge V \vDash \phi(\vec{x})\}. The trouble in ...
Comparing models through partial isomorphisms
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/568236/comparing-models-through-partial-isomorphisms
As you have noticed, the condition implies that \mathfrak{A} and \mathfrak{B} satisfy the same existential sentences. It follows that they also satisfy the same universal sentences. And, of ...
A sentence that has infinite models, finite model, but no finite model above certain cardinality
https://math.stackexchange.com/q/442888
Certainly. Consider \cal L to be the language containing one binary relation symbol <. T is the theory stating that < is a linear order (irreflexive, transitive and total). \sigma is the ...
Lagi Item
Kongsi
Salin
Disalin ke papan klip
Masalah yang serupa
mode(1,2,3,2,1,2,3)
mode(1,2,3)
mode(20,34,32,35,45,32,45,32,32)
mode(2,4,5,3,2,4,5,6,4,3,2)
mode(10,11,10,12)
mode(1,1,2,2,3,3)
Kembali ke atas