Microsoft Math Solver
Selesaikan
Berlatih
Unduh
Solve
Practice
Topik
Pra-Aljabar
Mean
Mode
Faktor Persekutuan Terbesar
Kelipatan Persekutuan Terkecil
Urutan Operasi
Pecahan
Pecahan Campuran
Faktorisasi Prima
Eksponen
Akar
Aljabar
Gabungkan Istilah-Istilah Serupa
Penyelesaian Satu Variabel
Faktor
Ekspansi
Menyelesaikan Pecahan
Persamaan Linear
Persamaan Kuadrat
Ketidaksetaraan
Sistem Persamaan
Matriks
Trigonometri
Menyederhanakan
Menyelesaikan
Grafik
Menyelesaikan Persamaan
Kalkulus
Turunan
Integral
Limit
Kalkulator Aljabar
Kalkulator Trigonometri
Kalkulator Kalkulus
Kalkulator Matriks
Unduh
Topik
Pra-Aljabar
Mean
Mode
Faktor Persekutuan Terbesar
Kelipatan Persekutuan Terkecil
Urutan Operasi
Pecahan
Pecahan Campuran
Faktorisasi Prima
Eksponen
Akar
Aljabar
Gabungkan Istilah-Istilah Serupa
Penyelesaian Satu Variabel
Faktor
Ekspansi
Menyelesaikan Pecahan
Persamaan Linear
Persamaan Kuadrat
Ketidaksetaraan
Sistem Persamaan
Matriks
Trigonometri
Menyederhanakan
Menyelesaikan
Grafik
Menyelesaikan Persamaan
Kalkulus
Turunan
Integral
Limit
Kalkulator Aljabar
Kalkulator Trigonometri
Kalkulator Kalkulus
Kalkulator Matriks
Selesaikan
Aljabar
trigonometri
statistik
Kalkulus
Matriks
variabel
Daftar
Evaluasi
\text{Divergent}
Divergent
Kuis
Limits
5 soal serupa dengan:
\lim_{ x \rightarrow 0 } \frac{2}{x}
x
→
0
lim
x
2
Soal yang Mirip dari Pencarian Web
Show that Let f : \mathbb{R} \setminus \{0\} \to \mathbb{R} be defined by f(x) = \frac{1}{x}. Show \lim_{x \to 0}\frac{1}{x} doesn't exist.
Show that Let
f
:
R
∖
{
0
}
→
R
be defined by
f
(
x
)
=
x
1
. Show
lim
x
→
0
x
1
doesn't exist.
https://math.stackexchange.com/q/2826102
Suppose that f: U → R is an application defined on a subset U of the set R of reals. If p is a real, not necessarily belonging to U but such that f is "defined in the neighborhood of p", ...
Suppose that
f
:
U
→
R
is an application defined on a subset
U
of the set
R
of reals. If
p
is a real, not necessarily belonging to
U
but such that
f
is "defined in the neighborhood of
p
", ...
Find \lim_{x\rightarrow0}\frac{x}{[x]}
Find
lim
x
→
0
[
x
]
x
https://math.stackexchange.com/q/2835948
For x\to 0 the expression \frac{x}{[x]} is not well defined since for 0<x<1 it corresponds to \frac x 0 and thus we can't calculate the limit for that expression. As you noticed, we can only ...
For
x
→
0
the expression
[
x
]
x
is not well defined since for
0
<
x
<
1
it corresponds to
0
x
and thus we can't calculate the limit for that expression. As you noticed, we can only ...
Disprove the limit \lim_{x\to 0}\frac{1}{x}=5 with epsilon-delta
Disprove the limit
lim
x
→
0
x
1
=
5
with epsilon-delta
https://math.stackexchange.com/q/1527181
Given \epsilon> 0, we want to find \delta> 0 such that if |x- 0|= |x|< |\delta| then |\frac{1}{x}- 5|< \epsilon. Of course, |\frac{1}{x}- 5|= |\frac{1- 5x}{x}| so, if x is positive, |\frac{1}{x}- 5|<\epsilon ...
Given
ϵ
>
0
, we want to find
δ
>
0
such that if
∣
x
−
0
∣
=
∣
x
∣
<
∣
δ
∣
then
∣
x
1
−
5
∣
<
ϵ
. Of course,
∣
x
1
−
5
∣
=
∣
x
1
−
5
x
∣
so, if x is positive,
∣
x
1
−
5
∣
<
ϵ
...
Is this a valid use of l'Hospital's Rule? Can it be used recursively?
Is this a valid use of l'Hospital's Rule? Can it be used recursively?
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/946785/is-this-a-valid-use-of-lhospitals-rule-can-it-be-used-recursively
L'Hôpital's Rule Assuming that the following conditions are true: f(x) and g(x) must be differentiable \frac{d}{dx}g(x)\neq 0 \lim\limits_{x\to c} \frac{f(x)}{g(x)}= \frac{0}{0}\mbox{ or }\lim\limits_{x\to c} \frac{f(x)}{g(x)}= \frac{\pm\infty}{\pm\infty} ...
L'Hôpital's Rule Assuming that the following conditions are true:
f
(
x
)
and
g
(
x
)
must be differentiable
d
x
d
g
(
x
)
=
0
...
How to explain that division by 0 yields infinity to a 2nd grader
How to explain that division by
0
yields infinity to a 2nd grader
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/242258/how-to-explain-that-division-by-0-yields-infinity-to-a-2nd-grader
The first thing to point out is that division by zero is not defined! You cannot divide by zero. Consider the number 1/x where x is a negative number. You will find that 1/x is negative for all ...
The first thing to point out is that division by zero is not defined! You cannot divide by zero. Consider the number
1
/
x
where
x
is a negative number. You will find that
1
/
x
is negative for all ...
precise definition of a limit at infinity, application for limit at sin(x)
precise definition of a limit at infinity, application for limit at sin(x)
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1776133/precise-definition-of-a-limit-at-infinity-application-for-limit-at-sinx
Some items have been dealt with in comments, so we look only at c). We want to show that for any \epsilon\gt 0, there is a B such that if x\gt B then |\sin(1/x)-0|\lt \epsilon. Let \epsilon\gt 0 ...
Some items have been dealt with in comments, so we look only at c). We want to show that for any
ϵ
>
0
, there is a
B
such that if
x
>
B
then
∣
sin
(
1
/
x
)
−
0
∣
<
ϵ
.
Let
ϵ
>
0
...
Lebih banyak Item
Bagikan
Salin
Disalin ke clipboard
Contoh
Persamaan kuadrat
{ x } ^ { 2 } - 4 x - 5 = 0
x
2
−
4
x
−
5
=
0
Trigonometri
4 \sin \theta \cos \theta = 2 \sin \theta
4
sin
θ
cos
θ
=
2
sin
θ
Persamaan linear
y = 3x + 4
y
=
3
x
+
4
Aritmetika
699 * 533
6
9
9
∗
5
3
3
Matriks
\left[ \begin{array} { l l } { 2 } & { 3 } \\ { 5 } & { 4 } \end{array} \right] \left[ \begin{array} { l l l } { 2 } & { 0 } & { 3 } \\ { -1 } & { 1 } & { 5 } \end{array} \right]
[
2
5
3
4
]
[
2
−
1
0
1
3
5
]
Persamaan simultan
\left. \begin{cases} { 8x+2y = 46 } \\ { 7x+3y = 47 } \end{cases} \right.
{
8
x
+
2
y
=
4
6
7
x
+
3
y
=
4
7
Diferensial
\frac { d } { d x } \frac { ( 3 x ^ { 2 } - 2 ) } { ( x - 5 ) }
d
x
d
(
x
−
5
)
(
3
x
2
−
2
)
Integral
\int _ { 0 } ^ { 1 } x e ^ { - x ^ { 2 } } d x
∫
0
1
x
e
−
x
2
d
x
Limit
\lim _{x \rightarrow-3} \frac{x^{2}-9}{x^{2}+2 x-3}
x
→
−
3
lim
x
2
+
2
x
−
3
x
2
−
9
Kembali ke atas