Skip to main content
Microsoft
|
Math Solver
Solve
Play
Practice
Download
Solve
Practice
Play
Game Central
Fun + improving skills = win!
Topics
Pre-Algebra
Mean
Mode
Greatest Common Factor
Least Common Multiple
Order of Operations
Fractions
Mixed Fractions
Prime Factorization
Exponents
Radicals
Algebra
Combine Like Terms
Solve for a Variable
Factor
Expand
Evaluate Fractions
Linear Equations
Quadratic Equations
Inequalities
Systems of Equations
Matrices
Trigonometry
Simplify
Evaluate
Graphs
Solve Equations
Calculus
Derivatives
Integrals
Limits
Algebra Calculator
Trigonometry Calculator
Calculus Calculator
Matrix Calculator
Download
Game Central
Fun + improving skills = win!
Topics
Pre-Algebra
Mean
Mode
Greatest Common Factor
Least Common Multiple
Order of Operations
Fractions
Mixed Fractions
Prime Factorization
Exponents
Radicals
Algebra
Combine Like Terms
Solve for a Variable
Factor
Expand
Evaluate Fractions
Linear Equations
Quadratic Equations
Inequalities
Systems of Equations
Matrices
Trigonometry
Simplify
Evaluate
Graphs
Solve Equations
Calculus
Derivatives
Integrals
Limits
Algebra Calculator
Trigonometry Calculator
Calculus Calculator
Matrix Calculator
Solve
algebra
trigonometry
statistics
calculus
matrices
variables
list
mode(1%2C1%2C2%2C2%2C3%2C3)
Evaluate
1
Quiz
5 problems similar to:
mode(1%2C1%2C2%2C2%2C3%2C3)
Similar Problems from Web Search
Show that “\Gamma \models S \Rightarrow \Gamma \vdash S” entails “if \Gamma \nvdash P \And \sim P then \Gamma is satisfiable”
https://math.stackexchange.com/q/691980
So I think this is what we may want to do. Suppose for contradiction that \Gamma is not satisfiable. This means that \Gamma has no models. Now, fix some sentence P and let S \equiv P \wedge \neg P ...
Elimination of quantifiers for the theory of equivalence relations with two infinite classes by back-and-forth
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1795992/elimination-of-quantifiers-for-the-theory-of-equivalence-relations-with-two-infi
There are a few problems with what your definition of E_0. You haven't defined E_0 on the class of all tuples, just on the pairs (the 2-tuples). When should singletons be E_0-related? What ...
Logic: Maximally consistent and validity
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/353030/logic-maximally-consistent-and-validity
Assuming that all the results you're invoking (for example that a maximal consistent set must contain either \phi or \neg\phi) are available, your argument looks correct but unnecessarily ...
A truth definition, wrong, but where
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/661222/a-truth-definition-wrong-but-where
It seems that you are trying to inductively defined a class of the form S = \{(\phi, \vec{x}) : \phi \in \text{Form} \wedge \vec{x} \in V^{\omega} \wedge V \vDash \phi(\vec{x})\}. The trouble in ...
Comparing models through partial isomorphisms
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/568236/comparing-models-through-partial-isomorphisms
As you have noticed, the condition implies that \mathfrak{A} and \mathfrak{B} satisfy the same existential sentences. It follows that they also satisfy the same universal sentences. And, of ...
A sentence that has infinite models, finite model, but no finite model above certain cardinality
https://math.stackexchange.com/q/442888
Certainly. Consider \cal L to be the language containing one binary relation symbol <. T is the theory stating that < is a linear order (irreflexive, transitive and total). \sigma is the ...
More Items
Share
Copy
Copied to clipboard
Similar Problems
mode(1,2,3,2,1,2,3)
mode(1,2,3)
mode(20,34,32,35,45,32,45,32,32)
mode(2,4,5,3,2,4,5,6,4,3,2)
mode(10,11,10,12)
mode(1,1,2,2,3,3)
Back to top